The Methods of Theological Reflection
A Theological Reflection moves through four phases: identifying, exploring, connecting, and applying. First the seminar group identifies and delineates the subject it will consider, whether it is a life experience, a belief, an aspect of or text from the Christian tradition, or an item drawn from contemporary culture. The second phase explores that subject, using a series of questions designed to stimulate discussion and elicit thoughts and feelings. During the next step, group members make connections with wider sources of meaning and truth, asking questions about how the exploration of the selected subject fits in with our beliefs, our life, our society. Some of the questions considered in both phases two and three are “perspective questions” that encourage us to get inside the subject and view things from a different perspective. An example is “What kind of a world do we find here?” As the process moves along, all four sources of understanding are brought in. In the last phase of the reflection, group members consider what insights and implications for action they have found during the process.
The Microscope Method
Although there are a number of ways of doing Theological Reflection, the process called “the Microscope Method” is the starting point. It begins in the “Action” quadrant of the four source model described above, so it starts with an actual experience of one of the group members. The process takes an in-depth examination of a “slice of life’ and uses it as a lens by which to investigate deeper themes and topics.
Other methods of Theological Reflection
Reflection beginning with a Text or Artifact
- The text/artifact can be from the faith tradition, such as a Bible story
- The text/artifact can be from culture
- The text can be explored via direct examination, by generating a metaphor about it (as with the microscope method) or via an Issue statement (see the Issue method of TR, below)
Reflection beginning with an Issue or Paradox
Like the Microscope method it beings with a life incident of a group member, but is more analytical. From the life incident, it derives an “issue” statement -- a statement that balances two contrasting options. An example of an issue statement might be: I love to travel for my job and I love to be at home with my family. An issue statement involves tension, because the two phrases pull in different directions. The statement should deal with what we actually feel, not with moral stands or how we think we should feel. The two sides of the issue revealed in the incident are examined for their Costs and their Promises (that is the good and bad side of both aspects) by the group.
Reflection beginning with a personal position
Group members explore a significant topic about which they hold varying views. This method requires the greatest amount of maturity and tact, and depends on group members trusting each other. It is not a debate between the opposing views; the purpose is not to try to change other people’s minds.
Wide-Angle Lens method
The Reflection begins with a larger picture, such as a theme from the week’s readings.
Reflection in Motion
This is a variant of the Microscope method, designed to “get people moving.” People literally move around the room, as it is divided into the four quadrants of Action, Tradition, Culture, and Position. For some people such a process is of great assistance. Movement can contribute to bringing head and heart together. As the flow of the thought process becomes visible, many find that TR becomes even more meaningful.
There are also additional forms of TR under development.
All forms of Theological Reflection use the four source model of understanding (Action, Tradition, Culture and Position). All also bring in the doctrinal themes of Creation, Sin, Judgment, Repentance/Redemption, although they do so in differing ways.
From the Rector
Worship Services
We offer 3 Sunday Services:
- 8 am - Traditional
- 9:15 am - More informal and family-oriented
- 11:15 am - More formal with classical chior